🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.